I
watched this movie with my girlfriend, who’s also taking Geography of Wine with
me. We enjoyed a 2011 Malbec from
Mendoza, Argentina while watching the film, but in hindsight, we should have
gotten a Chardonnay! While we both
enjoyed the movie for what it was worth, we both questioned the factual
accuracy of some the events in the film, especially when “this film is based on
a true story” is the first thing you see. But at any rate, we both learned a
bit about production of wines, and some of the old world versus new world
issues.
The
beginning of the Bottle Shock film
opens with two floundering wine businesses. Steven Spurrier, an Englishman
living in France, owns an “Academy of Wine”, but clearly lacks respect and
prestige among his French colleagues.
His coworker points out that his problem as a business and as an academy
is his lack of representation; his wines are overwhelmingly French. Spurrier then plans to travel to Napa Valley
to find explore some of the new world style wines, hoping to gain prestige and
recognition in the wine world by introducing what he hopes will be successful
American wines to France. He meets Jim
Barrett, whose winery looks to be going under, and quickly. Spurrier is
actually quite competent as a sommelier, and persuades his colleagues to
perform a blind tasting that will pit French wines against American
counterparts; however, there is a certain stigma surrounding the new world
style of American wines, and Spurrier hopes that in collaboration with Barrett,
he can change this. Especially in the
1970s, American wine-makers seem to have lacked much serious recognition, as we
can tell from some of the French vintners, as well as Spurrier’s obvious
disdain for the “Chicago vine”. These
attitudes are quickly reversed later in the movie as some of the Napa valley
wines clearly demonstrate impressive qualities that many of the French vintners
seemed to think only possible from old world styles. Spurrier demonstrates this
snobbery when he first meets Barrett, asserting that one cannot just become a
vintner simply because one wants to become one, rather it takes years of study
and a particular region and terroir
to yield “palatable” wine. This small
disagreement between the two highlights the argument of new world and old world
styles.
Barrett
has a team of helpers working on his Napa valley vineyard, basically his son Bo
and his friend, Gustavo, along with a new girl, Sam, looking to get some
experience in the wine world. Gustavo
quickly proves his expertise in the wine; when he isn’t busy hustling (in a somewhat
ridiculous and unbelievable bet that he could name the vintages of 3
undisclosed wines, a rather obvious rip-off, considering his friendship with
the bartender), he’s secretly busy applying his vintner skills to the
production of his own wine. This later
leads to his dismissal from Barrett’s vineyard, although Gustavo demonstrates
his knowledge before he leaves, explaining that he has worked on the land, and
he knows the characteristics of the soil and the vines. This scene shows viewers that terroir is still a considerable part of
wine-making; Gustavo tells Jim that one has to spend time working the land in
order to work in tandem with the soil and the vines to produce quality wine.
Although he was hustling a group of bar
goers, Gustavo is nonetheless very capable of identifying the flavors
associated with specific grapes, going so far as to identify a wine that is
50/50 Cabernet Franc and Merlot. He
clearly has a deeper knowledge of the Napa Valley terroir than he is given credit for; his secret wine production
yields excellent wine, and Spurrier ends up buying two bottles to take back
with him. Barrett himself spends time in
the film explaining the concept of Napa valley terroir and viticulture to Sam, telling her how the lack of
irrigation causes the vines to struggle, which in turn intensifies the
flavors. Repeatedly throughout the film,
there is a discussion of soil; Spurrier explains that the production of wine
begins with the soil, the vine, and of course, the grape. The smell of the vineyard for Spurrier is
connected to an ancient, primordial sub-consciousness among humans, as if it
was part of the human condition. These
discussions of the basic ecological necessities really ties the wines to the
land, making it a much more intriguing agricultural endeavor; some of these
discussions definitely enhance the idea of recognizing wine as a truly unique
yield of the planet.
Barrett showing Sam around his Vineyards
|
While
several grapes are discussed in the film, almost certainly the most significant
is the chardonnay grape, which yields the famous wine that ends up beating the
French. I was surprised to see the
“brown” Chardonnay. I had no idea that
that could really happen as a flaw. I
was, however, a little bit skeptical about the possible “Hollywood-ization of
that scene; its believable that I
didn’t know about it – but its less believable that a winemaker wouldn’t know
about the potential flaws his wines could experience, especially one that was
easily recognized by another vintner, indeed, one sitting on the side of the
road. However, I don’t know the facts of
the true story, so maybe it was a less known flaw in the 1970s, that resulted
from relatively newer techniques, like limiting the oxygen. The discussion of flaws definitely resonated
more with me since we have discussed some of the potential flaws that can occur
in wines; Spurrier himself mentions a “scant backbone” early on in the film and
a lack of acidity.
Steve Spurrier sets out for America in order to gain some recognition in the French wine world. He quickly finds that the experience is quite different than expected; wine tastings in front of trailers may not be what the French are looking for, but Spurrier thinks that the California wines might be.
Arguably the best scene of the film |
The
movie does an excellent job of really filming the entire process of wine. Opening on vineyards, the film takes the
audience through barrel rooms with stainless steel vats and oak barrels; it
shows owners walking through their vineyards, with Sam, Bo, and Gustavo tending
grapes. But aside from the growing and fermenting
processes shown in the film, it does an excellent job of showing the tasting
part of wine drinking; it really goes through all walks of the wine world, from
prestigious wine dinners in Paris to dusty country roads in California. In a memorable scene, Spurrier tentatively
tries some guacamole with a look of worried apprehension on his face; that
scene in particular helped to highlight the very different culture of wine. At
the same time, that American new world culture was able to produce high quality
wines, ultimately changing Spurrier’s opinion on the matter. While I found a good deal of the film was
pretty cheesy, some of those plot points seemed like it would make the film
more approachable for non-wine drinkers.
The flaws, growing and fermenting processes, and tastings could intrigue
novice and advanced wine drinkers alike.
Class discussion about “flabby” wines and other flaws contributed to the
experience of the film, just like knowledge about the different tastes
(especially of chardonnays) made the tasting scenes much more relatable. Additionally, learning about the equipment
helped to make me appreciate many scenes differently; for example, the scene in
which Sam is cleaning the thresher can be appreciated not only for obvious
reasons, but also for the cost and effort put into maintaining harvesting
equipment.
I
watched most of it again recently to remind myself of the actual discussions in
the film. While I still find some of the
scenes a little cheesy, I appreciate Spurrier’s mission a lot more. I feel like a small knowledge of wines,
fermentation processes, growing methods, and tastings really enhances the
movie; apart from the archetypal story of failing businesses having a sudden
dramatic stroke of fortune, the emergence of Napa Valley and new world style
wines on the international stage was a really intriguing plot, all the more
because it had true elements to the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment