Sunday, March 31, 2013
Tasting 28. March - Emeri de Bortoli Sparkling Shiraz
Name: Emeri de Bortoli Sparkling Shiraz
Variety: Shiraz
Region: South Eastern Australia
Country: Australia
Year: NV
Price: $9.95
Wine Shop Review: A relatively light, fresh style of sparkling Shiraz, with berries and hints of chocolate picking up just a touch of sweet vanilla on the finish.
My Review: This one was probably the most interesting for this week - I usually like syrah, and this wine was a sparkling red (something that I've rarely tried). Being kind of a dessert wine, I thought there was a pretty apparent chocolate flavor on the nose. I found it to be a little sweet, but the chocolate and kind of raspberry flavors worked well, and I did feel like I got a little bit of a vanilla quality with this one too. This, along with the previous wine, was my favorite for this week, although thats not saying too much, because I'm not crazy about sweeter wines like this. Some weeks have 2 or 3 that I find to be great, other weeks just have different ones.
I did not have food with this.
Tasting 28. March - Tres Ojos Garnacha
Name: Tres Ojos Garnacha
Variety: Rose
Region: Calatayud
Country: Spain
Year: 2011
Price: $6.95
Wine Shop Review: The wine has a brick red color with a bouquet of red raspberries, spice and white pepper. The palate is incredibly concentrated and rich. The modern styles of Garnacha in Spain are continuously being perceived worldwide as wines of extraordinarily good quality. This wine is fruity, juicy and shows a great depth, ripe tannins, length but yet with wonderful elegance and lightness. Enjoy with sausages, roasted meats, aged cheeses etc.
My Review: Like the previous wine, this had a lighter red color. The pourer was also enthusiastic about this wine, and I agree that it had some interesting flavors, and it wasn't bad. I thought I got a kind of tomato or wild cherry smell on the nose, and the taste was more of a raspberry flavor as well as a light pepper (like light black pepper). I've never had white pepper, but I suppose that is what it would taste like.
I didn't eat food with this, but it would definitely go well with pasta sauce with sausage.
Tasting 28. March - Montebuena
Name: Montebuena
Variety: 100% Tempranillo
Region: Rioja
Country: Spain
Year: 2010
Price: $8.95
Wine Shop Review: Ripe cherry and blackcurrant on the nose and in the mouth. Pliant and seamless in texture, with good heft and back-end energy. Finishes smooth and sweet, with fine-grained tannins providing shape and grip. Still on the young side but this wine drinks very well with an hour or so of decanting; it’s an excellent value for Rioja.
My Review: This wine had kind of a lighter red color. I thought the nose had a kind of cocoa/caramel element that I have picked up in a few wines that I've tried recently, but the taste seemed rather far from this. It had an earthy element that seems to be a characteristic of Tempranillo, and it also had a tannic, more stingy alcohol flavor rather than the fruit flavors that maybe would have helped to balance the hotness of the wine. Not bad, but overall not one I would buy.
I did not have food with this.
Tasting 28. March - Sainte Victoire Cotes de Provence
Name: Sainte Victoire Cotes de Provence
Variety: Grenache, Syrah, Cinsault
Region: Provence
Country: France
Year: 2011
Price: $8.95
Wine Shop Review: Bright salmon pink; typical of the fresh but warm Provence style. Refined and complex on the nose, with summer fruit and floral notes. Dry and crisp, with a delicate flavor and full texture.
My Review: I had never heard of the Cinsault grape, but I was interested in trying a rose made from syrah grapes. Although the pourer was enthusiastic about this, I found it to be wanting - it was one of the lightest rosés I've ever seen, so it didn't look to have long contact with the must. We agreed that the nose had an acrid, burnt rubber smell that seemed to be partially masking a crisp apple element. I felt like it didn't have much of a taste, and frankly, I found it to be empty with regards to any fruit tastes.
I didn't eat any food along with this wine.
Tasting 28. March - Canyon Road Chardonnay
Name: Canyon Road Chardonnay
Variety: Chardonnay
Region: California
Country: USA
Year: 2011
Price: $6.95
Wine Shop Review: Medium-bodied wine with notes of crisp apple and ripe citrus fruit with a hint of cinnamon spice. Delicious complement to grilled chicken, light pasta dishes or mid cheeses.
My Review: I didn't think this wine was bad - I usually like Chardonnay, and I thought this wasn't a bad attempt. The color was not particularly dark, so it didn't look to have spent long in oak, and this was kind of confirmed by the pourer, who said that the oak taste imparted was pretty light. On the nose, I got pear and apple flavors, but it wasn't particularly strong scented. The taste had some crisp apple elements, along with a light pineapple flavor, and I thought that there was a mild butter taste as well. My friends weren't really blown away by it, and though I didn't mind it, I probably wouldn't end up getting it, but I do like trying different Chardonnays to try to tell the difference.
I did not have food with this.
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Name: Potluck Sweet Malbec
Variety: 100% Malbec
Region: Mendoza
Country: Argentina
Year: 2010
Price: $7.95
Wine Shop Review: Deep red brilliant with violet hints. Complex, fruity, and predominant red fruits. Easy to drink, round with persistent sweetness, very well balanced with sweet tannins.
My Review: Surprisingly I really enjoyed this one, even though I'm normally not for sweet wines. The nose reminded me of light cherries. I thought it had a really nice flavor, and apart from the cherries I thought it reminded me of pomegranate. Sweet Malbec is something I'd never tried, and the pourer told us that the grapes were pulled a little bit earlier from the fermentation in order to keep some more residual sugars in the wine.
I did not have food with this.
Tasting 21 March - Domaine de Grange de Payan
Name: Domaine de Grange de Payan
Variety: Blended but a majority of Grenache
Region: Cotes du Rhone
Country: France
Year: 2011
Price: $8.95
Wine Shop Review: Intensely spicy and precise, with lively red berry flavors and a hint of black pepper. The Grenache, which makes up the majority of the wine, is deeper and more powerful, offering cherry and black raspberry qualities lifted by zesty minerality.
My Review: Darker red wine to this one; the pourer told me that there was a small amount of syrah, and I've typically liked the syrah wines that I've tried. It had a syruppy cocoa aroma, and I almost want to say a chalky or dusty element to the nose too. This had a heavier body, and it was definitely spicy with a little bit of zest like the review said.
No food, but this would be easy to pair with some grilled red meat.
Tasting 21. March - Tinto Figaro
Name: Tinto Figaro
Variety: 100% Garnacha
Region: Calatyud
Country: Spain
Year: 2009
Price: $6.95
Wine Shop Review: Figaro is 100% Garnacha, made from a selection of the best grapes grown in the oldest vineyards. While not truly an “oaked wine”, a short stay in oak barrels provides a nice spicy flavor boost. Bright violet. Dark berry and cherry aromas show a jammy aspect. Supple and gently sweet, with good lift to its black raspberry and boysenberry flavors. Smooth and broad on the finish, leaving behind a hint of spiciness. Extremely easy to drink and an excellent value.
My Review: I've gotten to try a lot more Garnacha wines lately, and I really liked this one. I got some strange initial smells, ranging from cocoa to flint to ceran wrap. Much differently, the taste had a mild smoky cedar flavor, and it was slightly more astringent than some of the other wines I tried on Thursday. The cherry flavors worked well with the cedar flavors, I thought.
No food with this one, although I can see it working really well with some good Italian sausage and pasta sauce, because of the spicy quality.
Tasting 21. March
Name: Maipe Malbec Rose
Variety: 100% Malbec
Region: Mendoz
Country: Argentina
Year: 2011
Price: $7.95
Wine Shop Review: Intense pink color with violet hints. Fresh red fruit bouquet, strawberry and cherry flavors, balanced acidity, dry and lingering finish. Excellent with tuna or green salad, pasta, spicy Asian dishes.
My Review: I've been a big fan of the Malbecs that I've tried, but I had never tried a Malbec Rose so I was interested in seeing how it compared. I thought it was really nice, and strawberry flavors seemed most apparent to me. The dry quality of the Malbec grape was deceptively covered up by the strawberry flavors, but certainly not a sweet wine.
I did not have food with this.
Tasting 24. March - Cortenova Pinot Grigio
Name: Cortenova Pinot Grigio
Variety: 100% Pinot Grigio
Region: Veneto
Country: Italy
Year: 2012
Price: $7.95
Wine Shop Review: Brilliant straw color with emerald reflections. Fresh and floral bouquet with a hint of pears, apricots and bananas. Fresh and inviting with bright fruit and an easy drinking style with a pleasing hint of almonds in the aftertaste. Pairs well with seafood dishes, risottos with scampi, spaghetti with clams, sole in white wine Perfect also as an aperitif.
My Review: I tried this one on thursday at the cellar and then once again tonight at Zeppolis. The most prominent flavors I got on the nose were both apple and pear, which is a little cliché to say about a white but thats what I got. Definitely a really easy wine to drink, light color, light body. The nose seemed a bit thin, but a lot more fruit flavor came out on the mid-palate.
I tried a creamy smoked gouda with this, and it was really good, the apple flavors were much more apparent.
Spring Break Winery Visitation - 14 March
THE
WINERY AT BULL RUN
Wintery Winery: fewer blooming flowers than in spring, but still a lot of fun! |
This
is a slightly different take on a winery visit – rather than visiting
per se, I came back to work at this winery. Admittedly, I had worked
there before, but since December, I’ve learned a lot about wines through the
chapters and lessons in this class, and the Winery itself has made new wines
and undergone a few changes, so it actually turned out to be a completely different
experience. And I was able to apply my newly developed wine knowledge and
palate to the wines and the experience as a whole. I even got to do a
tasting for 3 other Virginia Tech seniors, including one girl who is in
Geography of Wine too! But that meant as a pourer, I had to be on point,
or else I’m sure she would have called me out, what with her new wine-tasting
expertise.
When I'm not working, I get to hang around the winery and try some of the different wines |
To
begin with, I’ll describe the production facility and the winery itself.
Driving up to the winery, you pass by a wide expanse of land that makes up the
Bull Run battlefield, the site of two bloody engagements of the Civil
War. Separating the Winery from the field itself is the famous Stone
Bridge that was destroyed during the First Battle of Manassas. There are
two acres of Norton grapes to the left of the drive way; Norton is a grape with
a long history in Virginia, thought to be indigenous to the state, so the
placement of this grape varietal takes history into account. Although the
farm was not a winery during the Civil War, 19th century history is a big part of this
winery’s appeal, especially considering the proximity to the historical
battlefield.
The
Winery itself is very beautiful – it looks like a massive barn that stands a
few yards away from the ruins of the original house on the property, which has
been converted to a patio. Its off route 29 and secluded in a nice, quiet
property, about 22 acres, and there are horses just beyond the fence.
There is a beautiful sunset beyond the patio, and it makes for a great place to
spend the early evening.
Being
relatively very new, production of the first few wines occurred at other
wineries, namely Pearmund Cellars, as Chris Pearmund is the principle wine
maker for Bull Run. However, over the past 6 months, the Winery at Bull
Run has produced and barreled several wines just below the tasting bar in the
wine cellar. There look to be about 50 American oak casks in the cellar,
mostly with Merlot and Norton wines, two very popular reds at the winery.
There are also 6 Stainless Steel vats that will be used in the production of
the white wines.
This is actually my manager Chris, pushing down
the cap with the viticulturist, George Wilson.
Here George is gathering the grapes for the crush |
There
are currently 10 different wines available to taste (and I was actually
fortunate enough to get to try 2 new wines that will be introduced to the
tasting list soon). There are 4 whites, 5 reds, and one rosé. These
are all Virginia wines, made from Virginia grapes, with 2 new exceptions.
Since I’ve been at school for this semester, the Winery has introduced a dry
Riesling that was produced in Virginia, but with grapes from Washington.
The second exception is a fruit wine, and is a 100% peach wine.
The wine to the far right (Viognier) was recently replaced with the peach wine. |
My
Tasting Notes
WHITES
2011
Dry Riesling
This
wine was the only one with grapes that came from Washington State. I
had tried this when it was newly bottle, and it really wasn’t very good, but
since then it’s really made big improvements. With no residual
sugars, it was a dry Riesling with a clean, crisp, apple flavor, as well as a
light pear flavor. Since it was fermented entirely in stainless
steel, it had a very pale yellow color. The nose was also had light
apple flavors as well. A few people who came to the tasting were
surprised that they liked it, saying that they usually didn’t like Rieslings,
but were happy with this dry version.
2011
Chardonnay
Whereas
the Riesling was entirely stainless steel fermented, the Chardonnay was
entirely fermented in French oak. It also underwent malolactic
fermentation, which brought out some mild buttery qualities as well as tart
granny smith apple tastes. The light oak flavor worked well with the
buttery flavors, and I felt like there was a chestnut taste to this
one. The color was slightly darker than the Riesling, probably
resulting from the time it spent in oak.
2011
Delaney
The
first two were varietal wines, and this was the first blended white on the
tasting sheet. The grapes involved are Traminette, Vidal Blanc,
Viognier, and Riesling, and as a result of some of these sweeter grapes, there
is 1.2% residual sugars. There was a definite floral component to
this wine, maybe from the Traminette or Viognier. This blue bottle
contained a soft yellow colored wine, and the semi-sweet flavors combined to
give it a citrus flavor, similar to grapefruit or lemon. Although
its sweet, it did have a mild sharpness on the finish too.
Becky's favorite wine for a while was Delaney, so we got a bottle and came out for the day |
Classic
Peach
This
was one of the wines I was most eager to try; I had never had a fruit wine
before, and this was a popular one among the staff. It had a very
light clear color, and since it was fermented in stainless steel, the clear
color was not surprising. It was a little sweeter than I typically
like, coming in at 1.5% residual sugars. Nonetheless, I found it to
be very good – although potentially very dangerous. The nose had
young peach flavors, and unsurprisingly the flavors of the wine were very
peachy. Dangerously easy to drink (almost like a white sangria or
something), but I doubt the versatility of peaches.
2011
Rose
The
Rose was also a stainless steel fermented wine, however, unique to this one on
the Whites side, the wine is a co-fermentation of the two grapes used,
specifically Merlot (about 90%) and Chambourcin (about 10%). I
learned that co-fermentation meant that the grapes’ juices were fermented
together, rather than separately and blended together at the end of the
process. It had a light pink color, having spent limited contact
with the skins. It was a dry rose with no residual sugars, and
despite the strawberry and mild alcohol smell on the nose, the taste was a nice
combination of strawberry and raspberry flavors. I think it would
pair well with brie cheese.
REDS
Becky took this while I was finishing up a few tastings. You can see the vineyards in the distance, and of course, she's drinking Delaney. |
Additionally,
we tried a new version of the Delaney, which essentially excludes the
Traminette from the blend. A lot of my coworkers (who are much more
capable than I am) said that the Traminette was very apparent in the Delaney
being sold now, so the new one takes a very different approach. I thought
it was nice, certainly less floral/perfumy, but I still think I prefer the
original. Then again, maybe I just need to come back to it; I’m likely
biased because I’ve had several glasses of the original one, but only a tasting
of the new one.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)